A Systematic Review of The Contribution of Google Docs in Teaching Writing Skill
Abstract
The research aimed to investigate the contribution of Google docs in teaching writing skill. This research reviewed the previous studies on Google docs in teaching writing skill which were published within the past ten years. This research used systematic review as the method. There were five from seventeen journals have been selected by hand searching based on inclusion exclusion criteria and fulfill the criteria from seventeen journals. Five studies were included and reviewed in terms of (i) population, (ii) comparison, (iii) outcomes, (iv) study design, (v) publication years, (vi) language. This research utilized internet searching to search the journals. To analyze the data, this research used thematic analysis as technique of analysis data. The result show that (1) Google docs helped students in writing process. (2) The successful of Google docs provided by students’ scores increased. (3) Google docs encourage students’ motivation, interest, and communication. Further, Google docs were helpful, useful, and enjoyable tool for students to improve their writing skill.
Keywords: systematic review, Google docs, writing skill.
Full Text:
Download PDFReferences
Alchibani, Wessam. (2016). Impact on Student Motivation of Integrating Google Docs Within A Remedial English Writing Class. Notre Dame University, Louaize, Lebanon. ICICTE.
Alsubaie, J and Alshuraidah, A. (2017). Exploring Writing Individually and Collaborativaly Using Google Docs in EFL Context. Department of Curriculum & Instruction, King Saud University, KSA. Canadian Centre of Science and Education, 10 (10):10-30. E-ISSN: 1916-4750.
Berne, Jennifer. 2009. The Writing-Rich High School Classroom. New York, USA: The Guilford Press.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2): 77-101.
Chinnery, George M. (2008). ”On The Net You’VE Got some GALL: Google- Assisted Language Learning”. Language Learning and Technology. 12 (1): 3-11.
Creswell, John W. (2012). “Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” FOURTH. Boston, England: Pearson Education.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Review. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Livinski, A., Doug J., Nancy T. (2015). Undertaking a Systematic Review: What You Need to Know. National Institutes of Health Library.
Seyyedrezaie, Z.S., Ghonsooly, B., Shahriari, H., Fatemi, A.Z. (2016). A Mixed Methods Analysis of the Effect of Google Docs Environment on Efl Learners’ Writing Performance and Causal Attributions for Success and Failure. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 17 (3): 90-110. ISSN: 1302-6488.
Torgerson C. (2003). Systematic Review. London: International Publishing Group.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31571/jelte.v2i1.50
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Anindya Nur Islami Pratiwi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JELTE:journal of english language and education is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License